50 cal vs .68 cal

fozzymotto · **Posted:** Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:14 pm

http://mcarterbrown.com/50ballistics/

my vote.... .68

.50 cal.
less paint - easy for wipers
less accurate
less distance
cheaper paint but more costly starting all over
GI milsim--good try but NO for me

fozzymotto · **Posted:** Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:14 pm

also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZabfFBZ0bQ&feature=sub

toolbelt · **Posted:** Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:40 am

IDK you were on MCB as well...I was so ready to post Carters findings on this but you have done so for me.

fozzymotto · **Posted:** Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:46 am

also---- if you checked out the first 2 links you'll think his pro's list is pretty funny

http://www.pbjunkie.com/forums/blogs/7/blog72.html

fozzymotto · **Posted:** Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:52 am

here's a good one

http://www.p8ntballer-forums.com/vb/arc ... 28251.html

big daddy101 · **Joined:** Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:58 pm **Posts:** 90

so 50 cal sucks???? hahahahahaha :lol:

splatshack · **Posted:** Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:44 pm

Guys, check out the article on paintballx3.com They talk about the positives and negatives of 50 cal. Personally, i'm not going to make a decision until I have a chance to try it. We are considering selling a few GI Milsim products in our store.

ftfscenarioteam.freeforums.org

50 cal vs .68 cal

Who is online